Documentaries are one of the most important practices in filmmaking. By documenting reality, the filmmaker holds a mirror to society about issues they are passionate about. These films inspire, educate, and bring about action in their audiences. The Act of Killing presents the sadistic culture of the killers who participated in the 1965 Indonesian massacre. Instead of advancing the film through testimonials, The Act of Killing is prompted forward by the killers developing a fictional movie about their experience in the genocide. The fictional sets become a basis for Joshua Oppenheimer—the creator of The Act of Killing—to challenge the killers about the terror of what they did. When analyzing The Act of Killing, one must understand the documentaries context, audience, purpose, and point of view.
In 1965, the government of Indonesia
was overthrown by the military. The government recruited young “gangsters” to
be the leaders of their death squads against communists. These young men helped
the army kill more than one million alleged communists, ethnic Chinese, and
intellectuals in less than a year. They tortured, raped, and executed the
alleged communists and their families. Unlike other genocides, Indonesia has
seen no trials, no memorials to the victims, and no truth and reconciliation commission.
Today, the right-wing paramilitary
organization that grew out of these death squads control the Indonesian
parliament.
The
Act of Killing exposes the killers who performed unimaginable violence on
other human
beings. These murderers not only accepted what they did, but often boasted the horrors they inflicted. This film reveals the violence of war, and is intended to be shown to Westerners who become bystanders to genocide overseas. When talking about this film, director Joshua Oppenheimer gave this statement:
beings. These murderers not only accepted what they did, but often boasted the horrors they inflicted. This film reveals the violence of war, and is intended to be shown to Westerners who become bystanders to genocide overseas. When talking about this film, director Joshua Oppenheimer gave this statement:
" Thereis a scene in The Act of Killing in which I accused one of the perpetrators of committing war crimes, and responds by accusing the West of hypocrisy […] The U.S. and the UK helped engineer the Indonesian genocide, and for decades enthusiastically supported the military dictatorship that came to power through the slaughter. Neither the UK nor the U.S. can have an ethical relationship with Indonesia (or so many other countries across the Global South with similar histories of U.S.-sponsored state terrorism), until we acknowledge the crimes of the past, and our collective role in supporting, participating in, and — ultimately — ignoring those crimes."
Oppenheimer
created this film in hope of an audience that would force the United States
into acknowledging these crimes, and by putting Indonesia on trial. The film
has been seen by many people of power. In 2014, The Act of Killing was nominated for the Academy Award for Best
Documentary Feature, along with many other awards.
http://theactofkilling.com/awards_distinctions/
The purpose of The Act of Killing is to reveal that the violence we hope would be
unimaginable is not only imagined, but also glorified and repeated by the
perpetrators. It forces the audience to think critically about what makes it
possible for mass genocides to occur continuously throughout history. Through
displaying images of the horror that occurred, Oppenheimer forces the audience
to become uncomfortable and terrified that this event happened with zero
opposition. Although there is not a direct call-to-action, the horror depicted
in this documentary inspire viewers and bring about a desire for change. They
may fight for justice that results in changes in the balance of power, human
rights tribunals, reparations, and official apologies.
The most interesting aspect of this
documentary is the point of view depicted. The film experiments with the
killers’ perspective by having these men create fictional movie scenes about
the killings that occurred. Some realize that the killings were wrong, feeling
regretful and being haunted by the deaths. Others worry about the consequence
of the story on their public image. Members of the
paramilitary movement argue that they should boast about the massacre of millions as it terrifies the public into submission. By having this unique point of view, the audience gets to look into the minds of killers and the act of killing.
paramilitary movement argue that they should boast about the massacre of millions as it terrifies the public into submission. By having this unique point of view, the audience gets to look into the minds of killers and the act of killing.
After watching this documentary, I
am somber. Although there have been no changes to the acknowledgment of the
Indonesian genocide, this film has reached millions of people and will continue
to do so. After a screening for U.S. Congress members, Oppenheimer demanded
that the U.S. acknowledge its role in the killings. I rate this film five
nachos, as it inspired me to fight for this issue.
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQhIRBxbchU
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQhIRBxbchU
No comments:
Post a Comment