Before
the Flood is a 2016 documentary about climate change. The film took us
across the world, visiting Canada’s oil mines, Beijing’s smog, Florida’s floods,
and many other locations across the globe. This documentary provides the viewer
with a lot of facts, professional opinions, and imagery on what is going on
with our planet’s change in climate. The entire documentary is told by Leonardo
DiCaprio which provided me with a familiar face whom I love to see on the
screen. Unfortunately, because it was such a science based message, I found it really
hard to receive from a Hollywood actor. While the film was very interesting and
entertaining to watch, it’s big push for me as the viewer to take action
against Global Warming was unsuccessful due to how they chose to present the
message.
Obviously Global Warming and
climate change are relevant topics right now, and this documentary was made to
bring even more awareness to those issues (Before the Flood "About"
page). The movie was actually released just weeks before the presidential
election, THAT seems to be a message in itself. The entire documentary had a
very liberal stance, knocking conservative views any chance it got (as well as
no interviewed persons to talk about a counter argument), so there is another potential
example of the film’s context.
As far as audience goes, I believe
this was created to reach as many people as possible. We are all inhabitants of
this planet, and this film was made to educate us on what kind of effect we are
having on Earth. It was released on
National Geographic channel, and what I find interesting about this is that the
majority of people who are watch National Geographic probably already care
about the environment, so why release it there?
If they are truly trying to make a change, then wouldn’t they want to
reach the people who don’t know or care about climate change? It would make
more sense to release it on a national news network like ABC or even better, Fox.
In my opinion, that would have really spread the word.
The underlying purpose, or message
of this documentary was that each and every decision we make directly impacts
the global environment. Whether it’s our purchases at the grocery store, the
lights we use in our homes, or the cars we drive, just about anything we do to
this planet will have an effect on its life.
This film was made with the goal of educating everyone on the truth of
climate change so we can collectively make a change. What it kept saying was
that if a change wasn’t made, we are basically toast. And they reinforced this
idea by referencing and interviewing all kinds of renowned scientists,
politicians, and scholars. For instance, Al Gore, one of the most outgoing
climate change advocators, was referenced in the movie several times. Barack
Obama was even interviewed in the film, along with many scientists and scholars
who all supported the notion that global warming is killing our planet. Another
key figure they chose to highlight in the doc was The Pope, he even said that “we
need to take action against global warming.”
What they did was get countless credible people to support their message
and highlight the ideas that they wanted. This strongly appeals to the viewer’s
logos and ethos because they are providing us with facts and ideas coming from
individuals who are extremely credible in their fields. To get at our pathos
they did a lot of guilt tripping (in my opinion). I heard a lot of stuff about
how horrible we are for ruining our planet and why we’ve done such a poor job.
Another jab at our pathos was fear, the documentary did a good job of making us
feel scared about the future of Earth, which could make the viewer take a stand
against climate change.
As far as Point of View goes, I was
not pleased with the film. While the message was impactful and maybe even
factual, the fact that a Hollywood actor is delivering it to me completely takes
all credibility away. Even though Leo is the UN Messenger of Peace (a
position he has been asked to step down from due to scandal) I didn’t like
the fact that he was the middle man to reach the masses on this high level
issue. This is a guy who has a massive carbon footprint, from his plentiful jet
rides and luxurious cars and goods, so why is he the one preaching to me about
cutting back on my impact on the environment?!?
I give this documentary 2 stars,
and the only reason it had 2 is because it was entertaining and the
cinematics/visuals were surreal. I take away 3 stars because a documentary like
this is meant to make a change, but their delivery medium (DiCaprio- aka
Hollywood hot shot, aka not a scientist/scholar) did not get the job done for
me. When DiCaprio stops ruining our ozone with his fancy jet (hypocrisy), I’ll think about
my impact on climate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment