The True Cost documentary, directed by
Andrew Morgan, is a film created to inform Americans about the cost of clothing
consumption. It educates viewers through interviews of sweatshop workers,
footage of landfills in third-world countries, and interviews with
environmentalists. The intended audience is Americans of all ages; it seeks to
convince people that there are severe repercussions of disposable fashion. The True Cost did not reach a large-scale audience- it only was
nominated for the Environmental Media Awards in 2015 but did not win the award. However, the film did successfully raise
awareness about the danger of Fast Fashion and the need for change in the
garment industry to a small-scale audience.
American society likes documentaries on Netflix. But teenagers typically do not seek
spending a casual night-in to watch a documentary that will heavily convict
them to make a major life change. The True Cost addresses the issues of slave
labor, pollution, and GMO’s all relating to the fashion industry. So although
the message is serious, the director, Andrew Morgan, believes it is important for
Americans to learn about the impact of clothing consumption.
After learning about the Rana Plaza
factory collapse in 2013, Morgan became curious about how American clothing is made. After reading the article about the factory collapse, he began to uncover the hidden truths about the
fashion industry and sweatshops. Morgan finds these issues relevant because Rana Plaza is declared as the greatest fashion disaster in history. He finds that clothing consumption has
upped 500% in the last two decades and garments are the world’s second
largest polluter; the damage of the fashion industry
makes the film relevant to Americans more than ever.
Because the film educates viewers about GMO’s,
fair trade, sweatshops, and garment pollution, its intended audience is
American women and men of all ages. While it may seem as though The True Cost
is intended for careless Americans, the information applies to anyone who buys
new clothing. Because people of all ages consume
clothing, the audience is widespread and applies to many different people. Sadly, because many are unaware about how clothing is produced, the
documentary is not a hot topic. The film is not extremely popular because
the concepts are very new to American society to think about where clothes come
from.
The purpose of The True Cost documentary
is to explore the negative impact that clothing has on our world. Morgan brings
to light the horrific truth that women, particularly in India, are being mistreated in factories producing western
brand clothing. The film argues that the clothing industry disregards sustainability of the environment and that factory
workers and farmers are treated inhumanely.
What is the cost of Fast Fashion? Morgan
indicates it is pollution, death, disease, and addiction to consuming more
clothing. He takes the position that purchasing clothing is more of a moral
issue than we realize, and that consumers have the power to change the
direction of the garment industry. The purpose of the film is to educate
Americans about the treatment of garment workers, how clothing is made, mass
media, consumerism, textile pollution, and pesticide contamination. It is ultimately
made to highlight the detrimental cost of high-demand fashion production and consumption
for people and the environment.
The point of view of The True Cost is
fairly balanced. Although the director and producer are men, two of the
executive producers are women along with two male producers and a female producer. The perspectives include both genders and
most of the people behind the camera are journalists, writers, and
environmentalists. It is credible because several interviewees are fashion designers,
factory workers and owners, CEO’s, cotton farmers etc. Although Morgan does not
have experience with the fashion industry prior to making the film, he traveled
to 13 countries to educate himself. The True Cost seems to be liberal-biased
because global capitalism is addressed as a damaged system and is acknowledged
as the source of the issues addressed in the documentary.
While the concept of the film is factual and informative, it could be considered a problem that the statistics do not have
traceable sources. Although it covers many issues, it does not give a clear
solution to the problem. The viewers are encouraged to
revolutionize the fashion industry by changing purchasing choices, but it is
also implied that if global capitalism stays structured in its original form,
no real changes will be significant. While global capitalism is briefly
mentioned as the source of the problem, the viewer is never told how capitalism
should be adjusted- and how it would make a difference. The vague solutions make it unclear what Morgan wants Americans to do with this newfound information
about the fashion industry. Purchase Fair Trade? Buy secondhand? Leave it to
the Politicians to transform the capitalist system? The viewer is left wondering what the next
step should be.
There are several reasons The
True Cost documentary is effective, and there are few weaknesses in the film. The first reason it is effective is because it has changed the way I
purchase clothing and view people. It seems that Morgan wants viewers to see
workers in the third-world countries, like Shima, and realize that they are being treated horribly for the sake of
American fashion, and we should not stand by and let it continue. Since
learning about these disturbing facts, I have stopped purchasing through
unethical clothing companies. The second reason is because
it features diverse people and ethnic groups in addition to the filmmakers who are also a diverse group. Lastly, The True Cost is effective
because it shows the current cost of Fast Fashion and exposes the severity of
the problem. There are minor weaknesses in the film, but it is an overall successful documentary. Although Morgan's film does not provide a long-term solution or plan to revolutionize the fashion industry, he begins the necessary dialogue that will hopefully lead to a solution.
No comments:
Post a Comment